[Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses

[luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)]

Thanks Greg, 

This is what I think, but having a 21 I should decide before if I sell it,
or not...

Saludos cordiales
Luis  

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
GREG LORENZO
Enviado el: martes, 10 de abril de 2007 4:35
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: Re: RE: [Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses

If you can have one the 24 ASPH is the better lens.

Greg J. Lorenzo
Calgary, Alberta

----- Original Message -----
From: grduprey@mchsi.com
Date: Monday, April 9, 2007 8:04 pm
Subject: RE: [Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses

> I tried both this pat weekend and found both to be very nice, and I 
> also lean toward the 24, but don't haveany valid reason.  One thing I 
> found outwas that the entire viewfinder is almost the exact image 
> field of the 21, which is nice if you do not want to use an external 
> viewfinder.
> 
> Gene
> 
> -------------- Original message from "Luis Ripoll" 
> <luisripoll@telefonica.net>: --------------
> 
> 
> > Thanks for your opinion Howard, it's what I think, there's a
> small
> > difference between both lenees, and I use very few the 21. 
> > 
> > Saludos cordiales
> > Luis
> > 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]
> En nombre de
> > Howard Cummer
> > Enviado el: lunes, 09 de abril de 2007 3:06
> > Para: lug@leica-users.org
> > Asunto: [Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses
> > 
> > Hi Luis,
> > I have the 21 Elmarit pre Asph (purchased used from Bryan
> Caldwell several
> > years ago - thank you again Bryan) and the 24 Elmarit Asph
> purchased new
> > from the redoubtable Dr. Yao (thank you Joseph). In use with the
> M8, in the
> > field, I don't see much difference in their image cutting
> abilities at
> > middle apertures. I know that may be heresy but that's what I
> see. With the
> > M8 I lean to using the 24 more than the
> > 21 because with the 24 I don't need a separate view finder. Both
> lenses at
> > the moment are visiting Solms to be coded. 
> > Cheers
> > Howard (still in Tokyo)
> > On 9 Apr 2007, at 6:33 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote
> > 
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:24:35 +0200
> > > From: "Luis Ripoll" 
> > > Subject: [Leica] 21 & 24 Lenses
> > > To: "'Leica Users Group'" Hi all, I own a Elmarit M 2,8/21mm 
> > > (Pre-ASPH), I'm very happy with it,
> sometimes is
> > > some slight vigneting on the corners, in my opinion the Super
> Angulon
> > > R 4/21mm was better, but I'm no general complaints against the
> 21mm
> > > Elmarit. 
> > > Some days ago has been offered me a Elmarit M 2,8/24mm ASPH,
> I've read
> > > great eloges of this lens of a superior quality, but my
> question are
> > > about your experiences comparing the use of both lenses, I
> think that
> > > it make no sense to have both, the difference is very small. 
> > > 
> > > Probably the 24 would be a better companion for a 35mm, which
> I'm a
> > > great user, and the 21 for the 28 that I use very few. 
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance for your comments
> > > 
> > > Saludos cordiales
> > > Luis
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information