Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Gene for your information, I'll keep it, Saludos cordiales Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de grduprey@mchsi.com Enviado el: martes, 10 de abril de 2007 4:05 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: RE: [Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses I tried both this pat weekend and found both to be very nice, and I also lean toward the 24, but don't haveany valid reason. One thing I found outwas that the entire viewfinder is almost the exact image field of the 21, which is nice if you do not want to use an external viewfinder. Gene -------------- Original message from "Luis Ripoll" <luisripoll@telefonica.net>: -------------- > Thanks for your opinion Howard, it's what I think, there's a small > difference between both lenees, and I use very few the 21. > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En > nombre de Howard Cummer Enviado el: lunes, 09 de abril de 2007 3:06 > Para: lug@leica-users.org > Asunto: [Leica] 21 % 24 Lenses > > Hi Luis, > I have the 21 Elmarit pre Asph (purchased used from Bryan Caldwell > several years ago - thank you again Bryan) and the 24 Elmarit Asph > purchased new from the redoubtable Dr. Yao (thank you Joseph). In use > with the M8, in the field, I don't see much difference in their image > cutting abilities at middle apertures. I know that may be heresy but > that's what I see. With the > M8 I lean to using the 24 more than the > 21 because with the 24 I don't need a separate view finder. Both > lenses at the moment are visiting Solms to be coded. > Cheers > Howard (still in Tokyo) > On 9 Apr 2007, at 6:33 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote > > > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:24:35 +0200 > > From: "Luis Ripoll" > > Subject: [Leica] 21 & 24 Lenses > > To: "'Leica Users Group'" Hi all, I own a Elmarit M 2,8/21mm > > (Pre-ASPH), I'm very happy with it, sometimes is some slight > > vigneting on the corners, in my opinion the Super Angulon R 4/21mm > > was better, but I'm no general complaints against the 21mm Elmarit. > > Some days ago has been offered me a Elmarit M 2,8/24mm ASPH, I've > > read great eloges of this lens of a superior quality, but my > > question are about your experiences comparing the use of both > > lenses, I think that it make no sense to have both, the difference is very small. > > > > Probably the 24 would be a better companion for a 35mm, which I'm a > > great user, and the 21 for the 28 that I use very few. > > > > Thanks in advance for your comments > > > > Saludos cordiales > > Luis > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information