Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Thu Feb 15 09:50:29 2007
References: <20070212120726.QPIG1593.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp1.sympatico.ca> <000a01c74ef7$dda6c010$6501a8c0@asus930> <82c9dd70702121542h5bb87dafibc48fcf1a646b73d@mail.gmail.com> <ov98t2p0inqfj07l5vnir8nnp9u14b614i@4ax.com>
 
I concur - the 35 f2 is now the constant lens on my M8. When I'm out
and about and want variety I have the 50 Sumicron and VL 28 and 15. So
far I haven't tried a 90 but might one of these days. Mostly I'll use
an SLR for the longer focal lengths where the 100 APO rules. But for
travelling i'm just loving the 35 f2.

AB

So Eric doesn't get two copies of this message I've had to go to extra
trouble to cut out his address and replace it with the LUG address
after hitting reply to all. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

AB

On 2/15/07, Eric <ericm@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric wrote:
>
> >I found the 1.4 35mm a bit too big for my tastes and sold it for a 2.0
>
> Ditto.  I think the 35/2 with lens hood is the perfect size for a small,
> traveling camera.
>
>
>
> --
> Eric
> http://canid.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko@sympatico.ca) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)