Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have owned both. I found the 1.4 35mm a bit too big for my tastes and sold it for a 2.0 Now with the M8, I am glad I kept the 2.0 35mm - I don't miss the 1.4 option a bit. Plus, with the 1.4 the camera becomes front heavy. If you set it down, it will >likely< fall forward . But that is a minor quibble. Eric On 2/12/07, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > Vick, Erwin Puts has a pretty detailed comparison on his website, if you > haven't read it. > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > vick.ko@sympatico.ca > Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 22:07 > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH > lenses? > > Hello, > > Can some tell me about the f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses? Is the > f1.4 the available darkness extension of the f2, e.g. for more money, the > f1.4 is the same performer from f2 to f16 but one gets the f1.4 opening, > and > the f1.4 is larger/longer than the f2? > > ....Vick > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >