Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Scannin B&W
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Thu Jan 4 23:39:17 2007
References: <200701040815.l048EZPf079617@server1.waverley.reid.org> <2FD0F8C9-FBEB-4184-AB13-9E8F8E0EE881@optonline.net> <9A1F0D41-8164-49B0-9772-7D8CAE1DA4F1@mindspring.com>

Yes, but it takes a lot longer and is a lot more work with dust etc.

On 05/01/2007, at 2:55, Ric Carter wrote:

> negatives
>
> ric
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Hank wrote:
>>
>>>  Here's how I create those images. I use a Leica M4 with Ilford  
>>> HP5 film developed in D-76. From the resulting negatives I print  
>>> the photos on a VC paper using Dektol. Finally, I scan the prints  
>>> to disk using a Canon LiDe scanner. I don't manipulate the print  
>>> in any way.
>>
>>
>> I have an archive of about 1000 old B&W images to record on CDs.  
>> Both the negatives and prints are available. Would I get better  
>> results if I scanned the negatives directly with my Minolta 5400  
>> film scanner or scanned the prints with an Epson 600 dpi flatbed  
>> scanner? Most of the negtives are 35mm Tri X. The prints are 5x7s  
>> and 8x10s.
>>
>> Any advice would be helpful.
>>
>> Larry Z
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: Scannin B&W)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Scannin B&W)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: Scannin B&W)