Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted Yes, I said that they were given these M8s to USE, not KEEP. They used them and returned them. So I don't have it "all wrong" as you say. Of course, I have never been involved in testing for a manufacturer. I am not an exalted photojournalist or writer, just an overaged engineer. My opinions would never sell cameras. Your's and David Young's would. Celebrities sell merchandise. Jerry > Jerry Lehrer offered: >>> Of course, some of the exalted were given FREE M8s to use, but they >>> were > forbidden to mention the problems to the unwashed, under pain of > excommunication.<<< > > Jerry, >>> some of the exalted were given FREE M8s to use,<<<<< > > Actually you really have it all wrong about the above free! Certainly > when you don't know the truth on both sides of a situation! And what > came with it was.... "not to post pictures!" > > Besides when one is engaged in testing for any manufacture one doesn't > go blabbing their mouth off in public about their findings. I suppose > it's quite possible you've never been involved in this kind of > testing/reporting activity therefore you can blab all you want about > what you think. > > The cameras that were "loaned to certain people were because of their > technical skills and years of experience as professional > photographers!" Particularly using Leica cameras of many versions. And > were offered for "TEST PURPOSE ONLY!" > > Read this part carefully.. "AND THEY MUST BE RETURNED! PERIOD!!!!!!! > And they were! > > So quite frankly no one I'm aware of, exalted or other wise, got to > keep them!! > > So before you rag on about very talented people on list who received a > camera for testing and intelligent reports of what their experiences > were, wouldn't you think to get your story right first? > > My good fortune actually "using three different M8's" Over the past > several months I have not encountered any of the so called grief > others claim in whatever written reports or posted to various sites. > > Maybe some of this has to do with.... "I'm a photojournalist first!" > And a techie freak 13th! The bottom line of this for me, as always > with any Leica or other camera is,..... "How good are the moments > captured?" That's it. > > However I am known to have offered Leica Canada a little situation > about an R4 replacement several years ago rather than a 4th time of > supposedly fixing a piece of R4 junk! Again! > > "Either give me a new R4 or at noon the news media of Toronto will be > at your door step and video tape as well as shoot stills of me > smashing this Leica R4 to a million pieces!" One might say not good PR > for Leica! :-) > > They thought I was being a tad dramatic and offered to "fix the R4" > one more time, for free! However at noon the news folks were there > and before I got a chance at the first swing to concrete steps I was > invited to enjoy my "brand new in box R4!" Case closed! > > I don't molly coddle Leica camera's because I expect them to work, > with the same expectation no different than the M8 to work. All this > bitching, whining is crap as far as I'm concerned....... until I see > it from the cameras in hand! And only then will I accept there's a > problem. And only then will I take it up with leica, not the world of > the internet! > > OK yer turn. > > ted > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >