Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] bwc41 @ 800
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Dec 9 09:39:11 2006
References: <457AEF9B.50906@gmail.com>

On Dec 9, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Phil Swango wrote:

> Steve Barbour wrote:
>
> btw,  is the latitude of this film so narrow/sensitive that  
> shooting  at ISO 320 rather than 400 makes a visible difference?
>
> Steve, there's a ton of latitude but it's all on the overexposure  
> side.  If you're careful with exposure ISO 400 will look fine.  To  
> be safe you can overexpose a touch.  I always shoot it at ISO 250  
> or 320.  Same with C41 color films.  Underexposure by more than  
> half stop or so gives muddy shadows and grain.  But a 3-stop  
> overexposure can yield a good print.  As for your original  
> question, I wouldn't use ISO 400 c41 film at 800.  I'd rather shoot  
> on a color 800 film and convert to b/w.  Even better, DSLR.

thanks Phil.... that's very helpful.  I have always shot at 400,  
results OK...

but now I will follow your advice...and I appreciate it.


Steve

>
>
> -- 
>
> Phil Swango
> 307 Aliso Dr SE
> Albuquerque, NM  87108
> http://pswango.smugmug.com/
> pswango(at)att.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from paswango at gmail.com (Phil Swango) ([Leica] bwc41 @ 800)