Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] bwc41 @ 800
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Sat Dec 9 09:22:29 2006
References: <457AEF9B.50906@gmail.com>

Funny- same applies for the DMR.
Always underexpose a smidgen.

Eric


On 12/9/06, Phil Swango <paswango@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Steve Barbour wrote:
>
> btw,  is the latitude of this film so narrow/sensitive that shooting
> at ISO 320 rather than 400 makes a visible difference?
>
> Steve, there's a ton of latitude but it's all on the overexposure
> side.  If you're careful with exposure ISO 400 will look fine.  To be safe
> you can overexpose a touch.  I always shoot it at ISO 250 or 320.  Same 
> with
> C41 color films.  Underexposure by more than half stop or so gives muddy
> shadows and grain.  But a 3-stop overexposure can yield a good print.  As
> for your original question, I wouldn't use ISO 400 c41 film at 800.  I'd
> rather shoot on a color 800 film and convert to b/w.  Even better, DSLR.
>
>
> --
>
> Phil Swango
> 307 Aliso Dr SE
> Albuquerque, NM  87108
> http://pswango.smugmug.com/
> pswango(at)att.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from paswango at gmail.com (Phil Swango) ([Leica] bwc41 @ 800)