Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison
From: m4y at mac.com (m4y@mac.com)
Date: Fri Dec 8 21:04:43 2006
References: <A60E7CFF-A5DD-4A0E-BB3C-7324CEC5BBCA@comcast.net> <00e801c71a14$6908f010$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <7.0.1.0.2.20061207144539.027f5450@infoave.net> <027473DB-BFFD-4A76-859B-36FDB50D2B17@mac.com> <8660B948-4FC8-4C45-9ADD-05C4C92E3735@mac.com>

Thank you George.

I am reassured, but there are doubters out there aplenty.

Dom


On 06-Dec-8, at 9:57 AM, Lottermoser George wrote:

According to Leica's spec sheet:

"DNG? (Digital Negative Format not specific to any camera  
manufacturer), 2 different highly compressed JPEG levels. DNG? file  
information 16 bit-color resolution, 10.2 Mbyte file size per picture."

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:16 AM, m4y@mac.com wrote:

> Yikes! 8 bit! I may have to rethink my upcoming purchase.
>
> Do the histograms fall apart when you stress them? I am NOT paying  
> an M8 price for that kind of rubbish. My 2 year old Sony toy does  
> better than that. I might as well just keep it if that's the case.
>
> But I have my heart set on the M8. Please tell me it isn't so!



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
In reply to: Message from xrogers at comcast.net (Clyde Rogers) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from m4y at mac.com (m4y@mac.com) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)