Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG membership
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Oct 24 23:08:13 2006
References: <6D619CCA6048E82EE204F0E9@Rutabook.local> <453BBB8E.5060509@nathanfoto.com> <p06230927c161b92bf09f@[131.142.12.152]> <b809d1a8bb02af34a098e5e23dcd1ed9@jam.rr.com>

There has always been a lot of "noise" on the LUG: it does NOT appeal to
those who want a focused discussion. Reminds me more of a family at
christmas, discussing presents. In amongst the noise there are serious
discussions and growing friendships. I see it bubbling along pointlessly
discussing cigars until someone seeks help or raises a photographic
question: keep it together as one photographic group. Splitting it would
be pointless anyway, as it would not stop the cross chatter ;-)

Cheers

> I absolutely agree.  If the group is for people who use Leicas to make
> images, it matters not how they were made.  Though, the process will
> often be discussed - and should be. I've learned a bunch from those
> discussions.
>
> Frank Farmer
> Jackson, Miss.
>
> On Oct 22, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Richard S. Taylor wrote:
>
>> Brian - I agree entirely with Nathan.  Not that anyone's suggested it,
>> but splitting the LUG into film and digital lists would be like
>> shooting our selves in the foot.  Among alot of other things, the LUG
>> is about excellence in photography, however shot.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] LUG membership)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LUG membership)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] LUG membership)
Message from summicron at jam.rr.com (Frank F. Farmer) ([Leica] LUG membership)