Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LUG membership
From: summicron at jam.rr.com (Frank F. Farmer)
Date: Tue Oct 24 20:49:01 2006
References: <6D619CCA6048E82EE204F0E9@Rutabook.local> <453BBB8E.5060509@nathanfoto.com> <p06230927c161b92bf09f@[131.142.12.152]>
 
I absolutely agree.  If the group is for people who use Leicas to make 
images, it matters not how they were made.  Though, the process will 
often be discussed - and should be. I've learned a bunch from those 
discussions.

Frank Farmer
Jackson, Miss.

On Oct 22, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Richard S. Taylor wrote:

> Brian - I agree entirely with Nathan.  Not that anyone's suggested it, 
> but splitting the LUG into film and digital lists would be like 
> shooting our selves in the foot.  Among alot of other things, the LUG 
> is about excellence in photography, however shot.
Replies: Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] LUG membership)
 In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] LUG membership)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LUG membership)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] LUG membership)