Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wait wait, I think I did the math backward. If the film is ASA400 but I set the camera meter to ASA100, that's over exposing it 2 stops? At 10:15 PM 9/15/2006, you wrote: >Yup. Scanners like thin negs. > >Scott > >Richard wrote: > >>I am just loading up another roll of Neopan in the MP and I notice that >>the ASA was set to 100, meaning that the Nikkor 50/1.4 pics were >>underexposed by 2 stops: >>http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/091406/ >> >>I developed it in 777 10:30 mins thinking it was exposed normally. Now I >>scanned the negs in so the scanning may have compensate for the >>underexposure but even by eyeballing, the negs look pretty darn good. Is >>this possible that 2 stop underexposed negs can look like these? > >// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please >use richard at imagecraft.com)