Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Underexposed Nikkor pics?
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Fri Sep 15 22:15:32 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20060915201626.0893cbe8@192.168.100.42>

Yup. Scanners like thin negs.

Scott

Richard wrote:

> I am just loading up another roll of Neopan in the MP and I notice 
> that the ASA was set to 100, meaning that the Nikkor 50/1.4 pics were 
> underexposed by 2 stops:
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/091406/
>
> I developed it in 777 10:30 mins thinking it was exposed normally. Now 
> I scanned the negs in so the scanning may have compensate for the 
> underexposure but even by eyeballing, the negs look pretty darn good. 
> Is this possible that 2 stop underexposed negs can look like these?
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)



Replies: Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Underexposed Nikkor pics?)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Underexposed Nikkor pics?)