Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wait a couple months, and may be I will sell mine :-) First! As others mentioned, the 6 bit encoding is probably only for JPG production AND ... auto flash usage. Which I am sure most people don't care about. Speaking of which though, one thing does seem to be missing is a studio flash sync?!!! What's up with that? I guess one can use some thing of hotshoe flash to studio flash sync connector? At 01:02 PM 9/16/2006, you wrote: >All of this makes me start looking at the few Epson digital rangefinders >still out there. > >Jeffery Smith >New Orleans, LA >http://www.400tx.com >http://400tx.blogspot.com/ > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of John >Collier >Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 2:49 PM >To: Leica Users Group >Subject: Re: [Leica] Trying to understand M8 > > >Not justifying the price but no. The lens mount would have to be >changed for one with a relief where the "sticker" goes. The lens >would also have to be collimated too. You could take the old mount, >machine it and fit the "sticker". This would be cheaper but there >would be an edge where thechrome plating might start to corrode and >peel. > >John > > >On 16-Sep-06, at 1:40 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > Is the "upgrade" any more than a sticker applied to the back of the > > lens? > > Isn't this something that Porter's Camera Store could sell for $.99? // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)