Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Since I have botha F3 HP and a SL, I cna say the SL is a far better finder. The HP is a better finder than the standard F3 finder but still not to the SL level. Gene -------------- Original message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca>: -------------- > The HP was the low mag finder. The F3 finder was higher mag and > better, if you didn't use glasses. I have had both an F3 and an SL > but not at the same time. No particular favourite between the two > quite unlike my reaction after my first look through an M finder. > > John Collier > > On 1-Sep-06, at 7:29 PM, grduprey@mchsi.com wrote: > > > The F3 HP finder is pretty good, but not up to the standard of the > > R8/9 or the SL. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information