Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hand Baggage - Three Questions
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Aug 12 15:45:45 2006
References: <bbd.43b5057.320f9d60@aol.com> <44DE58FA.9090401@waltjohnson.com>

On Aug 12, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:

> Tom
>
> I learned my lesson well almost 20 years ago. Went on assignment to  
> Haiti and, as always, hand carried photo gear. Unfortunately, I had  
> insulin and needles in my checked-in backpack.  I made it to Port  
> au Prince and the backpack  went on a  side trip to Paris or  
> Algeria. (my next to the last last AirFrance flight) I managed to  
> find some IM needles in what past for a  local pharmacy and did   
> get by with what little meds I had in my pocket. Several obvious  
> things;
>
> 1.If you need it, carry it.
> 2. Always carry more than you need
> 3. Use AirFrance as a last resort.
> 4. If it is the last resort and you have no choice but AirFrance,  
> take a bus.
> 5. Only eat American or Canadian fries. :-)


Walt... it sounds like we are going to have a harder time than I  
thought, getting you to Paris...


:-)

Steve


>
>
> TTAbrahams@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I  never check in luggage so  have not had any experience with  
>> baggage  handlers in terminals around the world. When travelling I  
>> use only  carry-on-luggage. IF I would have to check in  bags I  
>> would  want to have assurance (and insurance) from whatever  
>> Airport Authority that  deals with it that it is treated in such a  
>> manner that my stuff is intact at the  other end. Losing  luggage  
>> is usually not the airlines fault; it is the departure or  
>> arrivals  airport that screws it up. Theft from checked luggage  
>> occurs at the luggage  handling end of the business. It is not  
>> that easy to steal something while it is  in the hold of an  
>> aircraft. One way of ensuring that they treat the stuff well  is  
>> to present the check-in guys with a detailed list of equipment to  
>> be  checked; serial numbers, and type of equipment and cost of  
>> replacement and have  them sign it. This would force the airline  
>> to put pressure on the relevant  Airport Authority to handle it in  
>> a responsible manner and also hold them liable  for theft or  
>> damage to the full extent of the value! You can put anything on a   
>> ticket limiting liability but in the end they are responsible for  
>> both you and  your luggage! The ticket constitutes a contract  
>> between the carrier, the airport  and you to deliver you to the  
>> assigned destination in a safe manner within the  parameters  
>> stated on the travel document. The  biggest problem will be the  
>> heavy dose of x-ray that checked luggage is subject  to. It will  
>> fog film and packing the film in lead-bags only increases the  
>> chance  of the handlers opening the bag to inspect the 'blobs"  
>> that show on the  screen - or boosting the level of x-ray used. I  
>> carry my film in clear plastic  Zip-loc bags, no paper-boxes and  
>> no plastic containers - just the film. Until  now I have never had  
>> a problem with this and if the travel does not involve  multiple  
>> airports I have not had any fogging of my Tri-X. Yes,  we  all  
>> want to travel safely but  also want both airlines and airports  
>> to  treat us decently. Without us they would not have jobs and  
>> they are a service  industry after all. As passengers we have  
>> rights and responsibilities  too and if we co-operate with each  
>> other travel should be possible in a  smooth manner. Make theft  
>> from checked in luggage a federal offence with a  minimum sentence  
>> in jail of at least 3 years and have IATA apply this to every   
>> airport that they control and in case of unwillingness to comply -  
>> remove them  from the air transport network. Air  travel always  
>> involved a bit of hassle and discomfort, but it is getting to the   
>> point where one weighs the necessities of it with "is it worth the  
>> bother and  expense" and stay home instead. If enough of us do  
>> that there will be fewer  airlines, fewer airports and far more  
>> incentive to treat passengers as paying  customers rather than  
>> inconvenient interruptions to their work! Tom  A  
>> ------------------------- Tom  Abrahamsson Vancouver, BC Canada  
>> _www.rapidwinder.com_ (http://www.rapidwinder.com/)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Hand Baggage - Three Questions)
In reply to: Message from TTAbrahams at aol.com (TTAbrahams@aol.com) ([Leica] Hand Baggage - Three Questions)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Hand Baggage - Three Questions)