Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You guys OVERthink :-) The simplest conclusion is usually the right one. What do most Hermes toting, Ralph Gibson special edition carrying, titanium shell'ing Leica users like to use? JPG mode or RAW mode? *Ding* JPG Now wouldn't it then make sense for Leica to just do some in camera RAW-JPG conversion that shows the camera in decent light? Sure it does. Of course power users will get the same or more using Photoshop and whatnot. At 11:46 AM 7/13/2006, Frank Filippone wrote: >Precisely what I asked....... Data is not theory or rumor or >speculation, it is hard facts. > >Does anyone have any data? What is the camera doing to >correct/amend/change/augment/etc. anything? > >If the 6 bit code does have specific in-camera functionality, how does one >get that same result if you use an uncoded lens of the >same but older vintage ( Thinking for example now of the 24 ASPH >)? Without the coding, the camera does not do something and >afterwards nothing can retro-fix the corrections into the image? > >Let me make a comment.... it would be smarter to allow for corrections in >some PS or other plug-in ( or even allow for the download >software make these changes) than to do anything in the camera. It would >save batteries, make changes in algorithms more flexible, >allow for third party support, make the camera faster to operate, make the >camera cheaper to manufacture ( smaller dumber uP) and >generally, make life more manageable. > >But Leica is not an acronym for customer service....... > > >Frank Filippone >red735i@earthlink.net > > > >I know that there has been speculation that the "6 bit" code will probably >have something to do with vignette correction within the camera. Leica >refers to "Image Optimization: without getting specific (at least in what I >have read). Does anyone know authoritatively what the code does to the >image (not the Exif or metadata) in the camera? > >Ed K > > > > > > I think that was largely discussed here a few weeks ago. The M digital's > > in-camera software will use different anti-vignetting and other > > postprocessing algorithms, depending on which lens is used. > > > > Didier > > > > > >>"Lenses in the current range as well as many earlier models can be > >>retrofitted at the cost of the owner to benefit from the image > >>optimization in the camera." > >> > >>"Apart from the improvement in image quality, this information is also > >>written into the EXIF image file." > >> > >>There is a more than passing comment that the camera itself does > >>something > >>with the coding from the lenses. Do we have any data > >>that tells us what? ( apart from recording it into the EXIF data > >>locations). > >> > >>Frank Filippone > >>red735i@earthlink.net > > > >on > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)