Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Precisely what I asked....... Data is not theory or rumor or speculation, it is hard facts. Does anyone have any data? What is the camera doing to correct/amend/change/augment/etc. anything? If the 6 bit code does have specific in-camera functionality, how does one get that same result if you use an uncoded lens of the same but older vintage ( Thinking for example now of the 24 ASPH )? Without the coding, the camera does not do something and afterwards nothing can retro-fix the corrections into the image? Let me make a comment.... it would be smarter to allow for corrections in some PS or other plug-in ( or even allow for the download software make these changes) than to do anything in the camera. It would save batteries, make changes in algorithms more flexible, allow for third party support, make the camera faster to operate, make the camera cheaper to manufacture ( smaller dumber uP) and generally, make life more manageable. But Leica is not an acronym for customer service....... Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net I know that there has been speculation that the "6 bit" code will probably have something to do with vignette correction within the camera. Leica refers to "Image Optimization: without getting specific (at least in what I have read). Does anyone know authoritatively what the code does to the image (not the Exif or metadata) in the camera? Ed K > > I think that was largely discussed here a few weeks ago. The M digital's > in-camera software will use different anti-vignetting and other > postprocessing algorithms, depending on which lens is used. > > Didier > > >>"Lenses in the current range as well as many earlier models can be >>retrofitted at the cost of the owner to benefit from the image >>optimization in the camera." >> >>"Apart from the improvement in image quality, this information is also >>written into the EXIF image file." >> >>There is a more than passing comment that the camera itself does something >>with the coding from the lenses. Do we have any data >>that tells us what? ( apart from recording it into the EXIF data >>locations). >> >>Frank Filippone >>red735i@earthlink.net > >on