Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Tue Feb 21 13:18:41 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060221155131.02a8a5b0@mail.rhtc.net>
 
The 4000 series printers are totally different animals than the rest
of the Epson line - excepting the vast large format printers. They are
hand assembled and aligned. They work well. I have a 4000, not the
4800, but after a bit of adjustment (I think the manual is terrible)
it is making marvelous prints. I'm going to print on roll paper for
the first time in March.

Any suggestions, Tina?

Adam

On 2/21/06, Tina Manley <images@infoave.net> wrote:
> At 11:43 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
>
> >But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've
> >learned from this thread.
>
> It's a great printer, unless you want to go with the massive
> 4800.  You'll actually save money in ink and paper with the 4800.
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)