Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Tue Feb 21 08:43:04 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com>
There are currently 1020 people subscribed to the LUG.
I don't think more than 100 of them have /ever/ posted, and on average it's
the same two dozen people who do most of the posting.
But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've learned
from this thread.
Replies:
Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to:
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)