Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue Feb 21 09:22:32 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net><a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org>
Brian,
I am using an Epson Stylus Photo R800, which is the entry level printer
using the ink process common to the 1800 and 2400, and I am really impressed
with the results. A word of caution, though, about papers. I started out
with the same generic paper that I had used with my older Epson printer,
and found that, after the prints dried for a few days, the ink layer began
to shrink and crack. I switched to Epson paper, and have had no more
problems.
There is an on-line source for ink refills at http://www.atlex.com
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
Replies:
Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to:
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)