Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]umm - I'd have to agree. The skin I have been getting with my DMR far exceed what I have have gotten from other digital cameras and from I have seen out there. No audiophile tweaker here. Just seems to be the case. Eric On 2/3/06, Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com> wrote: > > Plastic skin tones, eh? > > Riiiiiiight. Keep telling yourself that. Perhaps in the way that some > audiophiles find ways to criticize sound. > > I think I see things pretty well and I won't call the skin tones out > of the 1Ds "plastic". It's just FUD. > > Adam > > On 2/3/06, pwerner@bluewin.ch <pwerner@bluewin.ch> wrote: > > Glad to hear from somebody on this board who is a happy DMR owner. > > > > So am I. The low light capability could be better, but the image quality > > is superb. I am not only talking of sharpness. Other DSLR may produce > sharp > > pictures, too (and skin tones that look like plastic). IMHO the > outstanding > > feature of the DMR is the color rendition. > > > > After having used Canon and Fuji Pro DSLR, for the first > > time with digitals I found that the finished print had that "Kodachrome" > > look, as opposed to the Fuji or Ektachrome colors of the competiion. > > > > Some may prefer a skin rendition that looks like plastic, I definitely > > prefer the Leica rendition. > > > > As far as I am concerned, there is no need, right now, for a Mark II. > > > > I hope I do not start a flame war > > Another happy DMR owner and "old hand" (May 2005). > > > > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >