Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The DM-R has landed!
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Wed Feb 1 14:08:47 2006
References: <20060201115701.63919.qmail@web25503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <DB1D73D1-B3DD-4816-A8C6-E3DFFBB2A964@btinternet.com> <011301c62777$a8c8c800$2ee76c18@ted>

I hope that Mr. Kobayashi is a member of the  
LUG ....................... he has surely a Voigtlander digital  
rangefinder body in preparation for the Photokina ............  
2006 ............. and at ? $2000 retail ,,,,, and capable of ISO  
1600, 3200.

B.

On 1-feb-2006, at 22:37, Ted Grant wrote:

> Frank Dernie said:
>>>> Talking of equivalent film speed has anybody tried the film  
>>>> trick of
>> pushing 2 stops at the 800 asa setting and "correcting" exposure  
>> in  the RAW convertor?
>> Could work - may give it a try myself on my digital.<<<
>
> But Frank for $6000. why would the photographer have to screw  
> around fiddling things as you suggest? When a Canon 20D and or  
> whatever other Canon models do it with such simplicity as dialling  
> up the number and capturing incredible positive results?
>
> I also realize many on the list never think there can possibly be  
> any kind of fine quality at those ASA ratings. That of course is  
> because they've never had to "work for a living" at producing  
> photographs without any excuse of.. "oh it was too dark!" Nor have  
> they taken the time to find out what can happen when you do shoot  
> under those kind of light conditions.
>
> I'm sure the new breed at Leica Germany have forgotten what the  
> hell Leica's were used for... "shooting quickly, quietly and with  
> no screwing around." And if the new "M digital Leica" can't reach  
> ASA 1600-3200 they can kiss a bunch of dedicated M Leica carrying  
> photojournalists good bye no matter how nice and shiny it looks!
>
> I don't doubt for one second there are ways this DMR unit can be  
> fiddled to get a sort of 1600-3200 rating, but for the dollars, why  
> the hell should any one pay the money for it when it defeats the  
> quiet, quick operation of using a Leica? R or other wise?
>
> I'm gong to wait until some one makes a believer out of me before I  
> spend a farthing on a DMR! Hell I'd buy another 20D first!
>
> ted
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] The DM-R has landed!)
In reply to: Message from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] The DM-R has landed!)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] The DM-R has landed!)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] The DM-R has landed!)