Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]When UK's "Amateur Photographer" magazine reviewed the DMR, they similarly bemoaned the limiting of the ISO range because of the excellent capabilities of the device, and were confident that it could cope not just with 1600, but with 3200 and that it was thus an opportunity missed. Now I know some people cannot conceive of ever using such a speed (hello, Peter!), but it's surely one of the huge advantages of digital capture. Excellent quality at low settings, as witnessed by Peter's shots, and the ability to get a usable shot in pretty dark conditions with just a simple adjustment. I'm sure Leica will address this in future, but in the meantime, it's not the tool for Ted. Which is a shame. Nick --- Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote: > on 1/31/06 10:50 PM, Ted Grant at tedgrant@shaw.ca > wrote: > > > For the moment there isn't a hope in hell I'd buy > one to use on the type of > > assignments I shoot, unless without question, the > meter can be set at ASA > > 1600 and 3200. And it produces better quality > capture than my Leicanon 20D > > at those ASA ratings. > > Ted, you might be interested in this thread on > photo.net: > > http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00F5p6 > > No mention of 3200 but 1600 is described as a 'no > brainer'. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for > more information > ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com