Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Mon Sep 26 12:37:06 2005
References: <g7lej11nl4bovpe98p5aotrdc1vhov4oef@4ax.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20050926002001.0478c390@mail.robsteve.com> <BC90B39A-5FB3-495A-8705-3940ABA06BA7@mindspring.com>
 
Wow, that first shot is a real keeper, IMHO. Wonderful.

Just curious, but are you using an M to shoot these studio
lighting shots?

Ric Carter wrote:

> Both nice shots of a darling child.
>
> Kids frequently have trouble understanding we adults have in our own  
> toys.
>
> Maybe growing up does suck.
>
> Ric Carter
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies
>
> On Sep 25, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Robert Stevens wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> The sync cord:
>>>
>>> http://canid.com/current/jbm_050925_08.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The whole flash:
>>>
>>> http://canid.com/current/jbm_050925_03.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Acros 100.  Xtol 1:1.  All comments welcomed.  Really.  I'm bored and
>>> lonely.  Otherwise I wouldn't be taking pictures that include the  
>>> camera
>>> equipment, now would I?  :)
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Eric
>>> http://canid.com/
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)
 In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)