Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Mon Sep 26 04:19:31 2005
References: <g7lej11nl4bovpe98p5aotrdc1vhov4oef@4ax.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20050926002001.0478c390@mail.robsteve.com>
 
Both nice shots of a darling child.

Kids frequently have trouble understanding we adults have in our own  
toys.

Maybe growing up does suck.

Ric Carter
http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies

On Sep 25, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Robert Stevens wrote:

>
>
>> The sync cord:
>>
>> http://canid.com/current/jbm_050925_08.html
>>
>>
>> The whole flash:
>>
>> http://canid.com/current/jbm_050925_03.html
>>
>>
>> Acros 100.  Xtol 1:1.  All comments welcomed.  Really.  I'm bored and
>> lonely.  Otherwise I wouldn't be taking pictures that include the  
>> camera
>> equipment, now would I?  :)
>>
>> --
>> Eric
>> http://canid.com/
>>
>
Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)
 In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] the camera equipment is *not* part of the picture?)