Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark:
Many thanks for your reply!
Bill
Mark Langer <langeratcarleton@gmail.com> wrote:
Bill,
I had both the 35/3.5 Summaron and the 35/2 Canon. I now just have the
Canon, which is in every way a better lens, IMHO.
Mark
On 9/7/05, Bill Smith wrote:
>
> Is the 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM equal to the 35/2 Canon LTM? If so, what
> year/ series is best to buy?
>
> Bill
>
> Jeff Sumner wrote:
> You need a J-12 to compare 'em all against. It's f/2.8...
> >> I forgot... I have a 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM as well....
> >>
> >> That is 4. Is that OK?
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
---------------------------------
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.