Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Summicron-M 35 Lens recommendations?
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Wed Sep 7 08:00:21 2005
References: <3B439F3E-8008-4C92-8301-15AF1028771F@mindspring.com> <20050907073754.38095.qmail@web51005.mail.yahoo.com>
 
Bill,

I had both the 35/3.5 Summaron and the 35/2 Canon. I now just have the 
Canon, which is in every way a better lens, IMHO.

Mark

On 9/7/05, Bill Smith <wrs111445@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Is the 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM equal to the 35/2 Canon LTM? If so, what 
> year/ series is best to buy?
> 
> Bill
> 
> Jeff Sumner <jdos2@mindspring.com> wrote:
> You need a J-12 to compare 'em all against. It's f/2.8...
> >> I forgot... I have a 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM as well....
> >>
> >> That is 4. Is that OK?
> >>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Summicron-M 35 Lens recommendations? Thks Mark)
 In reply to: Message from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Summicron-M 35 Lens recommendations?)
Message from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Summicron-M 35 Lens recommendations?)