Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: 50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50"
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Aug 30 12:50:34 2005
References: <BF3A21BA.51D0%philippe.orlent@pandora.be> <a81881d2f1cc22bf369a3172e969120a@mindspring.com> <a2f8f44705083006531143a994@mail.gmail.com> <9E2A2B26-8F0C-4DD9-AFAA-F8768006B05C@cox.net>

Easy one, Steve. The Summicron. It's not the newest one, it's from 73,
but it's been working every since then.

Daniel

On 8/30/05, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
> if you could keep only one...etc..? Steve
> 
> 
> On Aug 30, 2005, at 6:53 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> 
> > <!-- Don't want the wife to see
> > Summicron, Elmar 2.8, Elmar 3.5, Jupiter-8, Jupiter-8M x 2, Helios
> > 103, Nikkor 1.8 autofocus, Nikkor 1.8 manual focus, Nikkor 1.4, Pentax
> > 43/1.7
> > -->
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 8/30/05, Craig Zeni <clzeni@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >> <confessional mode>
> >>
> >> 'cron 40/2
> >> Canon 50/1.4
> >> Canon 50/1.5
> >> Nikkor 50/1.4
> >> Konica 50/2
> >> DR 'cron 50/2
> >> Summar 50/2
> >> Elmar 50/2.8
> >> Industar 50/3.5
> >>
> >> </confessional mode>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Now "Boring 50" Was: "Leica branded lenses")
Message from clzeni at mindspring.com (Craig Zeni) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")