Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: 50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50"
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue Aug 30 08:54:26 2005
References: <BF3A21BA.51D0%philippe.orlent@pandora.be> <a81881d2f1cc22bf369a3172e969120a@mindspring.com> <a2f8f44705083006531143a994@mail.gmail.com>
 
if you could keep only one...etc..? Steve


On Aug 30, 2005, at 6:53 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:

> <!-- Don't want the wife to see
> Summicron, Elmar 2.8, Elmar 3.5, Jupiter-8, Jupiter-8M x 2, Helios
> 103, Nikkor 1.8 autofocus, Nikkor 1.8 manual focus, Nikkor 1.4, Pentax
> 43/1.7
> -->
>
> Daniel
>
> On 8/30/05, Craig Zeni <clzeni@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> <confessional mode>
>>
>> 'cron 40/2
>> Canon 50/1.4
>> Canon 50/1.5
>> Nikkor 50/1.4
>> Konica 50/2
>> DR 'cron 50/2
>> Summar 50/2
>> Elmar 50/2.8
>> Industar 50/3.5
>>
>> </confessional mode>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from clzeni at mindspring.com (Craig Zeni) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")
Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")
 In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Now "Boring 50" Was: "Leica branded lenses")
Message from clzeni at mindspring.com (Craig Zeni) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) (50mm junkies Re: [Leica] Was "Boring 50")