Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Aug 3, 2005, at 5:24 AM, Mark Langer wrote: > M3 pro -flare resistant rangefinder patch, long rangefinder base, > "Leica" engraving on top where God meant it to be, brass where later > versions have zinc, less cluttered viewfinder, depth of field > indicator on later models, top of the line build quality and real > vulcanite. > > Con - double stroke versions not liked by everyone (I had no problem), > odd flash synch, no hot shoe, potential rangefinder prism problems > that can't be fixed, thanks Mark... can you give me more on the prism problems...what to look for, how to avoid? Steve > no internal meter. > > Mark > > On 8/3/05, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > >> I'm curious...but never used an M3... >> >> Leica M3...? the best built M body ever ? with the best >> viewfinder of all ? >> >> is this the common wisdom? >> >> is it true? >> >> other pro's/cons? >> >> other thoughts, or considerations about the best M3 of all ? >> >> anyone care to compare, especially to M5, M6 M7 .... >> >> >> Steve >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >