Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]M3 pro -flare resistant rangefinder patch, long rangefinder base, "Leica" engraving on top where God meant it to be, brass where later versions have zinc, less cluttered viewfinder, depth of field indicator on later models, top of the line build quality and real vulcanite. Con - double stroke versions not liked by everyone (I had no problem), odd flash synch, no hot shoe, potential rangefinder prism problems that can't be fixed, no internal meter. Mark On 8/3/05, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > I'm curious...but never used an M3... > > Leica M3...? the best built M body ever ? with the best > viewfinder of all ? > > is this the common wisdom? > > is it true? > > other pro's/cons? > > other thoughts, or considerations about the best M3 of all ? > > anyone care to compare, especially to M5, M6 M7 .... > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >