Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That guy in the Baixa (underneath the "gold" "silver" "jewels" sign) is STILL there. Or he was a week or so ago... On Jun 1, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > These pictures I was take on Lisboa with ONLY this lens, Elmar-M > 2,8/50mm. > For me it is an excellent lens! > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=462925 > > Saludos desde Barcelona > Luis > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En > nombre de G > Medina > Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 01 de junio de 2005 5:18 > Para: lug@leica-users.org > Asunto: [Leica] Elmar 2.8 50mm: Current or Previous Version? > > According to Erwin Putts, the current model is a stop or > two ahead of its predecessor. Just this fact alone should > be enough for one to decide on the current model, and > leave the previous model at the camera store. But, it > seems there is something aesthetically nicer about the > previous version. It just "feels" more sure in the hand > than the current model, to me. Wide open the current > model is better no doubt, but how do you feels about > these two lenses in terms of quality, handling, feel, and > subjective performance. If I recall correctly, they are > identical in terms of size and weight? > > > > __________________________________ > Discover Yahoo! > Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. > Check it out! > http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >