Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You might find you can't always try all alternatives, and somethings have no choice ;-0 On 08/02/2005, at 2:16 AM, Ted Grant wrote: > Tarek Charara said in answer to a B.D. post: > Subject: Re: [Leica] 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200 > > > >> Le 7 f?vr. 2005, ? 15:34, B. D. Colen a ?crit : >> >>> Would you - a. rather see the image through a brilliant viewfinder, >>> and >>> end up with a crappy image because film is simply not up to capturing >>> enough detail in the low light ? - or would you - b. rather >>> compromise >>> on the image seen through the viewfinder and end up with a >>> high-quality >>> image? > > Tarek Charara >> This is like the penis question: Would you rather have a small hard >> one or a big soft one? I'll go with a brilliant viewfinder and a high >> quality image! ;?)<<<,, > > Ah sooo Tarek, > > But this begs the immediate question ......... "Have you ever used a > 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200 or 20D at the 3200 ASA setting and made 12"X18" > prints? And yes with cropping where necessary? > > If not, then your comment about penis and print size is meaningless. > ;-) > ted > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Alastair