Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Nov 13 18:48:20 2004

Then again, I think it might of been Eberhard K. that did the LA Zoo
shoot???
S. Dimitrov

> From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:52:48 -0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph
> 
> Believe me I agonized over that trip. But I'm stuck these next few
> semesters. He did come out to Paul's Photo, Torrance, CA and lend out gear
> for their LA zoo trip.
> Unfortunately, I had to attend a seminar, process theology and evolutionary
> biology, that same day. I had paid for in advance, and it was
> non-refundable. Never mind committing to writing a position paper
> afterwards. So, that was that.
> S. Dimitrov
> 
> 
>> From: Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 13:03:34 -0500
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph
>> 
>> Slobodan, should have come to the LHSA meeting in W'burg. Christian 
>> Erhardt
>> had a ton of loaner equipment, including several 50/1,4 ASPH's. See you in
>> New Orleans (Mar '05) and San Francisco (Oct '05)
>> 
>> Seth         LaK 9
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph
>> 
>> 
>>> See, this' what I hate about a rational and sensible post. Now I'm trying
>>> to
>>> figure out how to squeeze that lens into a non-existent film camera
>>> budget.
>>> Digital no problem, but for film, old eagle eyes on this end will spot it
>>> in
>>> a second as she does the monthly paperwork.
>>> I wouldn't mind taking one out for a quick roll. Might try that when they
>>> have another Leica festival travelling through town.
>>> S. Dimitrov
>>> 
>>>> From: TTAbrahams@aol.com
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:29:13 EST
>>>> To: lug@leica-users.org
>>>> Subject: [Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph
>>>> 
>>>> When this lens was announced I scoffed at the idea - a $2500 standard
>>>> 50/1,4! I thought it was a joke, but I was sufficiently intrigued to ask
>>>> Leica
>>>> for a
>>>> loaner at photokina. Big mistake! I have now used it since late 
>>>> September
>>>> and
>>>> I have put 60-70 rolls of film through it (Tri-X) and a couple of 100
>>>> images
>>>> in my loaner RD-1. Not only is it a major improvement over the old
>>>> Summilux (I
>>>> have 2 of those), it beats the 50/2 hands down. The floating rear 
>>>> element
>>>> makes a big difference in close shooting (a weak spot with the old
>>>> version)
>>>> and
>>>> its smaller size, compared to the older one, makes it comfortable to 
>>>> hold
>>>> and
>>>> carry.
>>>> Leica also managed to remove some of the unpleasant "Asph" jagged look
>>>> that
>>>> the 21/24/35's suffered from. Contrast is higher than the old version
>>>> (easy to
>>>> do - they tended to be a bit "flat") but it is not so elevated as to 
>>>> make
>>>> it
>>>> difficult to print. The extra stop over the 50/2 is a bonus, but even
>>>> without
>>>> that I would still use it as my preferred 50. It might sound like
>>>> heresy - but
>>>> it is that good. The pull out/locking hood is an improvement - I have
>>>> been
>>>> bugging Leica since the infamous 90/2 of 1980 to come up with that lock
>>>> (all
>>>> my
>>>> "collapsible" hood lenses have holes drilled and tapped in them that
>>>> locks
>>>> them in a fully extended position. Oh, you can use gaffer tape too, but
>>>> the
>>>> glue
>>>> residue is tacky (pun intended).
>>>> What is the result of this test - at LHSA in Williamsburg I asked Stefan
>>>> Daniel to send me a bill for the lens - I am buying it! Stefan smiled 
>>>> and
>>>> said
>>>> "I
>>>> knew you would".
>>>> Any negatives? Well, nit-picking I would say that the lock for the hood
>>>> is a
>>>> bit too short - it only turns about 1/8's of a turn and occasionally I
>>>> have
>>>> found it in my bag with the hood collapsed. A good ? turn would have 
>>>> been
>>>> better. I am not getting rid of my old DR Summicrons or the nice chrome
>>>> standard
>>>> Summicrons - they are the lenses that I have used for 40+ years and
>>>> sometimes
>>>> one gets nostalgic and want that "look" - but for regular shooting it is
>>>> 50/1,4
>>>> Asph!
>>>> I use the 50 about 30% of the time - wider lenses (21/24/28) about 20% 
>>>> of
>>>> the time and the 35's for the balance. The last month I have been trying
>>>> to
>>>> get
>>>> by with only a 50/35 combo - 35/2 or VC 35/2,5 on a M2 and the 50/1,4
>>>> Asph on
>>>> the MP. Nice "walk-about" package.
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Tom A
>>>> --------------
>>>> Tom Abrahamsson
>>>> Vancouver, BC
>>>> Canada
>>>> www.rapidwinder.com
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Was ....SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph)
In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] SUMMILUX 50/1,4 Asph)