Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Charles, It is entirely possible to take bad pictures in Italy, but your are good. However, I am using this to make my usual comment that location does not matter as much as we all think. The main things is to get to know the place. My best pictures in the past few years have been from Zurich, Seville and Amsterdam. Why? Because I have either lived in or spent lots of time in these three cities, so I got to know them well and was able to convey their atmosphere or whatever you want to call it. When I go to a previously unknown place I tend to take record shots. I suspect for many of us it is this way. Certainly, the best pictures on the LUG (in my opinion, anyway) are taken where the photographer lives or works. Nathan Summicron1@aol.com wrote: > Since I mouth off so much about taking pictures with minimal equipment > I've > gone ahead and opened a gallery on the leica users gallery for > edification, > abuse, or whatever. > > It is at: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/Traveling-light > > and you are most welcome to have at it. The two images so far, I must > admit, were shot with a humble Olympus XA on Ilford XP2 (GOD! I hope they > don't > quit making it!) but I was in Italy -- is it possible to take a bad > picture in > Italy? > > I just bought an abrahmson M2 winder, expect a flurry of leica images soon. > > charles trentelman > ogden, utah > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com