Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:21 2004

On 3/17/04 4:26 PM, "Sam" <sam@osheaven.net> wrote:

> I wonder if you can recall what was lacking in the XK system? It
> certainly was not an array of finders, screens, diopters, bulk film
> back, intravalometer, battery packs, motor drive, macro tubes,
> bellows,  copy stand, or lenses from fish-eye to 500mm. Here is an early
> system map to help you remember:
> 
> <http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/minoltaxk/htmls/xksys
> tem.pdf>
> 
> I would rewrite your laste sentence to read "Bad mouthing [those who
> know what they are talking about] is not cool. "
> 
> Sam S
> 
> 
> Henning Wulff wrote:
> 


I strongly didn?t care for the looks of the Maxum's. Very clunky in a bad
was as far as I was concerned.


Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland, Oregon

New Improved
http://rabinergroup.com/




--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


In reply to: Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)