Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: sam at osheaven.net (Sam)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:17 2004
References: <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <OFEA8DEA9A.3EB2048F-ON86256E5A.0005E338-86256E5A.00061C45@crnotes2.rockwe llcollins.com> <A5DEF66C-77D9-11D8-9214-000A95CD9BF8@mac.com> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca>
And when that 7D hits your hand ALL your lenses become anti-shake lenses
at not a penny more.
Sam S
Dan C wrote:
> I've since picked up a used Minolta 85/1.4 and now both my Minolta
>100 and my beloved 90/2 APO Summicron ASPH are collecting dust in the
>bottom of my equipment bags. So I will have no problem deciding to buy the
>Minolta Maxxum 7D, barring terrible reviews, prices, etc.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from leicaman at sympatico.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)