Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 3/16/04 6:02 PM, "Mike Durling" <durling@cox.net> wrote: > You have to remember that for $999 you get a camera with a lens that has > a maximum aperture of F4.5-5.6. If you want decent glass on the > digirebel you have to spend a lot more. > > Not for a minute suggesting that the D-2 is a bargain ;>) > > Mike D > > Marc Attinasi wrote: >> I just cannot get past that noise at ISO 200 and 400 - too bad, but >> that is the curse of the small sensor with current technology. The >> noise was what drove me from the D1 as well - a great camera >> optherwise, but unsatisfactory for me in low light, where I like to >> shoot. I am scratching my head wondering, why would I get the D2 >> instead of the Digital Rebel? As much as I am NOT a fan of the hybrid >> 35mm / DSLR philosophy, the $999 Digital Rebel / 300D just seems to >> take better pictures at half the price. I think it is just a simple >> matter of a larger sensor and otherwise good (comparable?) optics and >> electronics. >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Isn't there a cheap software solultion for noise? A friend of mine uses it. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland, Oregon New Improved http://rabinergroup.com/ -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html