Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nope - not a Telyt either
From: daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Fri Aug 27 04:01:32 2004
References: <20040827100555.ZCFN14383.out010.verizon.net@zhnhypermetal>

They're beautiful shots. Peaceful. I like the bamboo a lot.

Time and time again I see how delicate Canon works with colors. It's like
they have a "signature".

Daniel

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Mitch Zeissler wrote:

> Nice try, but still nope.  Not a Noct or a 'Lux, not a Telyt or a Vario.
>
> Try an C@non 85mm f/1.2 on a Leica 10D.  All shots were 1/4000th @ f/1.2 or
> a little smaller.  After reading about it for a long while and finally
> shooting with it, I'm convinced the 85 is the digital Noct.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mitch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: animal
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 4:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nope - not a Noct
>
> > http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1ssgc/Lilypons/index.htm
>
> gambling not my forte but anyway.400telyt with extension tube?
> best regards
> simon jessurun
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from mitch.zeissler at verizon.net (Mitch Zeissler) ([Leica] Nope - not a Telyt either)
Reply from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] Nope - not a Telyt either)
In reply to: Message from mitch.zeissler at verizon.net (Mitch Zeissler) ([Leica] Nope - not a Telyt either)