Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital M
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sun Jul 11 11:24:47 2004

Right - $2500 for a Noctilux to give me the equivalent of a 1.4 at 1600;
what $5K for the special wide angle so I will have a 21 again? -
$4500-5500 for the body - So about 12K before this thing is of any real
use to me? I don't think so. :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Steve Unsworth
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 12:02 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital M


You could always buy a Nocti if 800 wasn't fast enough ;-)

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of B. D. Colen
Sent: 11 July 2004 16:46
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital M


So we're looking at a magnification factor of 1.37, a top iso of about
800, and a price somewhere north of $4500 K? And a new lens that will
undoubtedly cost more than a couple Ms?


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Digital M)
In reply to: Message from mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Digital M)