Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/05/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Wed May 19 03:32:29 2004
References: <ngqja05vmfvanhnnkb35tf3caqju7e2hdb@4ax.com> <001501c43cdd$28a382e0$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>
Don:
> why mess with success?
That's been my reason for sticking at 1:3. :)
What were your times for Neopan 1600 in 1:3 and 1:2? I might have to run a
batch at 1:2 now.
--
Eric
http://canid.com/
Replies:
Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
In reply to:
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)