Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Wed May 19 14:43:06 2004
References: <4rdma0tu6ob1657bf9kgc87619ofv533oq@4ax.com> <000b01c43d93$46738840$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

Don:

>At 1:3 I was at 13.5 minutes at 68F. At 1:2 I am at 10 minutes but now
>at 70F. (My basement gets warmer in the spring)  As always, use someone
>else's time with caution as YMMV.

Thanks!  Yeah, that's why I wanted both...to know what the difference was.
I run 1600 in Xtol 1:3 at 70F for 12 mins.  That's about the same as 13.5
mins in 68F.  So I'll have to try your 10 minute time in 1:2 and fine tune
from there.  Thanks!

--
Eric
http://canid.com/


In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)