Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/05/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Tue May 18 03:49:44 2004
References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040517153854.01bacfb8@pop.runbox.com> <003301c43c6b$61aa3b50$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>
Don:
>My B&W developer of choice is Xtol, usually at 1:3 but lately 1:2 for
>Fuji Neopan 1600.
Just curious...what do you see with Neopan 1600 at 1:2 that you like better
than at 1:3?
--
Eric
http://canid.com/
Replies:
Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
In reply to:
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)