Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.)
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri May 7 23:17:20 2004
References: <BCC163C0.B958%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5C069D4A-A07D-11D8-A7C3-0003930C1F28@bradbrad.com>

Brad,

My 35-70mm Vario Elmar has a constant aperture of f4, and Leica also
offers f2.8 35-70mm and (I think) f2.8 70-180mm zooms which has
breathtaking sizes and prices.

Nathan

brad daly wrote:
> 
> here's a question for you smart folks: why is it that leica's R-mount
> zoom lenses are all variable aperture, whereas canon and nikon's pro
> lenses are generally fixed aperture.  i assume there's some optical
> reason for this, and i'm just ignorant.  i know canon increased the
> size of its mount considerably when it went from the FD to the ED (eos)
> mount, which has allowed it some breathing room, wheras nikon worked
> within the constraints of the F mount.  i've only handled an R a few
> times, but i do seem to remember it having a big hole.
> 
> always a-wonderin',
> brad
> 
> --
> brad daly
> brad@bradbrad.com
> http://www.bradbrad.com
> 
> What Would Bill Hicks Say?
> 
> "War, what is it good for?  It's good for business."
>         --Billy Bragg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html

Replies: Reply from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) (variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.))
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) (variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not. ))