Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/05/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.)
From: brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly)
Date: Sat May 8 00:44:47 2004
References: <BCC163C0.B958%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5C069D4A-A07D-11D8-A7C3-0003930C1F28@bradbrad.com> <409C6DDC.F9FD2BA0@chello.nl>
On May 8, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> Brad,
>
> My 35-70mm Vario Elmar has a constant aperture of f4, and Leica also
> offers f2.8 35-70mm and (I think) f2.8 70-180mm zooms which has
> breathtaking sizes and prices.
okay. well, clearly i'm not up on R lenses. perhaps i asked an
ignorant question.
--
brad daly
brad@bradbrad.com
http://www.bradbrad.com
What Would Bill Hicks Say?
All photographs are accurate. None of them is the truth.
--Richard Avedon
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) (variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not. ))
Message from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) (variable aperture (was Re: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not.))