Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yup, even though it's a big lens. While little lenses are cute, I'm concerned with the image. And given how much I shoot in low light, IF I can get comparable image quality to that of the LuxASPH from 1.4 up, and can get good quality at 1.2, I'll sacrifice size for the extra half-stop, which, as Noct fans know, can spell the difference between hand-holdable and not being handholdable. Sure, I wish I could afford both, but at the moment I don't have $1100 to plunk down on another lens for a film camera. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve LeHuray Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 10:55 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] ASPH Flare and harsh Bokeh > > All of that said, if the new Cosina 35 1.2 is as flare resistant, > contrasty and sharp as the Summilux, I'll be putting my Summilux up > for sale. ;-) > > B. D. > ....even though it is a very big lens? I believe 62mm vs 46mm long for the lux. It looks like a small telephoto. sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html