Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 02:00:12 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJOEJMKNAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <OE36w46E3uf21nc4tUG000051cb@hotmail.com> <3B6859FB.739EA9ED@istate.net> <OE13C3hSsxLtBH49KOl00003210@hotmail.com> <3B686210.C3E0C3@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <OE696dgo2S3AXXEjK9T000055c6@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010802172628.03cb3c80@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <004b01c11bf0$7e2772a0$dc53bc18@andrewsc>
 
Andrew Schroter wrote:
> 
> And what do you see?
><Snip> 
> >
> > After printing from 4x5, 6x7, and 6x6, occasionally  we will have to print
> > something from 35mm. You suddenly see, first hand, what film is made of.
> >
> > Jim


Grain.


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)