Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 21:55:36 +0200
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJOEJMKNAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <OE36w46E3uf21nc4tUG000051cb@hotmail.com> <3B6859FB.739EA9ED@istate.net>
 
Bill writes:

> A good photographer can use a point and shoot
> and get good photographs. A bad snap shooter can
> use a 4x5 and get bad photos. A rose is a rose
> is a rose.

Then it stands to reason that 35mm and a Leica will produce results to match any
other format, in the hands of someone with the necessary skill and talent.  A
poor workman blames his tools, in other words.
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
 In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)