Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 4/9/01 9:04 AM, B. D. Colen at bdcolen@earthlink.net wrote: >> > Actually, it goes a step or two further than that. If Tom A.s real world > testing is to be believed - and why not? - 28 1.9 Cosina is damn close > to the Summicron in everything except cost. So unless one is a > rocks-and-barns-tripod-100as-slide-shooter, it seems illogical to spend > the extra $1500 for a margin of difference one will never see in real > world shooting. Sure, if money is absolutely no object, then what the > heck, there is certainly no question the Leica lens is built better. But > if money plays any part in decision making, the choice is pretty much a > no-brainer. ;-) > > B. D. But this is a Leica list ;-( Happy snaps, Steven Alexander